![]() |
The Active Eye in Architecture Sir George Trevelyan First published in 1977 by The Wrekin Trust This book is out-of-print, available only on this website |
Next page Previous page Start of the book Download a zipfile HOME Articles Books Brief biographies Close encounters Photos |
We must not fear to speak and think of architectural forms as having their own inner life and intention. They are all, seen imaginatively, developing in some direction, as if they possess an inner dynamic. We can sense the direction in which they hold possibility of evolving. Then we shall feel them livingly related to other decorative or structural forms around them. We shall also be able to carry the recollection of a feature in one building over to another. There may be metamorphosis between buildings. What one building tries but fails to achieve is successfully carried out somewhere else. Let it also be noted that the secrets are often revealed in second rate buildings. We may look everywhere and learn from most improbable sources. The basic proposition is that column in all its variants is wall transformed. Every section of wall holds the potentiality of pilasters, when viewed with active imagination. Like Michelangelo's slaves, columns are struggling to come to birth all over the place out of solid chunks of masonry.
Look at the gable (Fig. 8B) which is faintly suggestive of a pediment. The horizontal corner member has half become a capital and a pilaster could easily form in the corner. There is a frequent 'mannerist' form of a column with solid square stones spaced throughout its length (Fig. 8C). Here clearly we see the struggle going on between the wall and column principles. In interiors we constantly find that a string course runs along the length of a wall and turns round the narrow width and has at once become a semi-capital, inviting a pilaster below it. These are random examples which would signify little enough if we were looking statically. But if we can look dynamically they should suffice to start the real game of hunting columns as these shy creatures emerge and hide themselves again. The process is happening everywhere and we can discover it in the interiors of buildings as well as the façades. Once we have learned to find complementary images and discover their differences by active looking from one to the other, we shall find that pillars in process of becoming are the chief feature revealed.
The little drawings in Fig. 9 may suffice if the reader will look strongly from one to the next and through the series so as to get the feeling of changing and evolving images. A is a plain unbroken wall holding all potentialities unrevealed. In B the action has begun of 'softening up' the surface into recesses indicating the direction of development. C shows the break through which we shall expect to be accompanied by the beginnings of columnar hardening. This is shown by the appearance of a moulding which for all the world is an elementary capital, with another as potential base. Wall begins to change its character. In D a brave thing has happened and a giant column has planted itself midway between the arches. At once the wall space shows more as two heavy square pilasters supporting the column. The columns hold an entablature, (ie, architrave or lintel, frieze and cornice). What is the real function of the heavy shadowed cornice which cuts right across the façade of a building? Surely it is to say 'Here endeth an image, to be born again above in a more refined state'. E shows this refinement. Place one image on the next and the differences become visible through the movement. The Doric column has refined itself into the slenderer Ionic, standing on a plinth with a balustrade. The wall member has articulated itself into two free columns showing open space behind. F repeats the process. A third-storey image appears. Still slenderer are the large columns now changed into Corinthian and the subordinate columns have broken away entirely from their parent structure to be absorbed by the arch which has transformed itself into a window. The Renaissance façade with threefold orders, Doric, Ionic and Corinthian, is so familiar in its thousand variations that we tend to take it for granted. What are these orders? Why threefold in this way? So dominant a feature must surely hold a deeper symbolical meaning than merely a selection of designs. It comes alive to us when we recognize that the shadowed cornices invite us to treat their stages as a series of images flowing one into the next. There are of course a number of interpretations. Here I offer one which seems to arise out of our manner of looking.
The Doric column represents the truth that the column has 'being'. It is nearly a creature. It approaches the attributes of a man or a God. This is the advanced stage of the metamorphosis of wall. Move the sensitive eye-beam up and down the subtle flutings. The lines, unbroken by any base, pass down into and seem to merge with the willpower of the earth. The Greek Doric gives us the most powerful experience of the limb-system of man, the seat of will. It is indeed the athlete's column, in which the capital, not greatly developed, serves primarily a structural purpose. Now approach with reverence a great Corinthian column. As you make it alive in your looking it will take on a kind of royalty. It stands like a king, silent and full of power, gazing out and supported by its attendant pilasters. Capital (caput, capita) indeed becomes a head, capping the great coordinated body structure. If with your eye-beam you really feel through the rising acanthus leaves, you will experience it in your own head, like the complexities of thought. It has been rightly called the philosopher's column, a representative of thinking man. Hence the feeling of royalty.
![]() |
The Active Eye in Architecture Sir George Trevelyan First published in 1977 by The Wrekin Trust This book is out-of-print, available only on this website |
Next page Previous page Start of the book Download a zipfile HOME Articles Books Brief biographies Close encounters Photos |